Between v. Nc: 2025:Khc:9577
High Court
06 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Between v. Nc: 2025:Khc:9577
Date of order
06 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2018-19, 2018-2019
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Between v. Nc: 2025:Khc:9577, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: Subject to the aforesaid directions, petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9577WP No. 5505 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6 DAY OF MARCH, 2025
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION NO. 5505 OF 2025 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. GEETHA RAMKUMAR W/O SRI MAHESHWARAN SABAPATHY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, 2. SRI. MAHESHWARAN SABAPATHY, S/O LATE T. V. SABAPATHY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, BOTH ARE PRESENTLY R/AT NO. 4508, NILAND STREET, UNION CITY, CALIFORNIA, USA ZIP 94587. AND REPRESENTED BY THEIR PA HOLDER SRI P SREEDHAR AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS S/O P. ANAND SETTY, NO. 88, 1 FLOOR, 2 MAIN, OPP: RAMAKRISHNA NURSING HOME, GAYATRI DEVI PARK EXTENSION, Digitally signed byAASEEFA PARVEENVYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE - 03 Location: HIGH…PETITIONERS COURT OFKARNATAKA(BY SRI. RAVI L. VAIDYA, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 051. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION,
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT 7 FLOOR BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA,
BANGALORE - 560 034.
3. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD 1(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION,
BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 95.
(BY SRI. M. DILIP, AGA)
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE REFUND IN TERMS OF THE REVISED SUBMITTED BY THEM FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 DTD 24.11.2023 VIDE ANNXURE-C AND C1 DATED 24.11.2023 WITH INTEREST FOR DELAYED REFUND FROM 31.12.2024 TILL THE DATE OF ACTUAL PAYMENT INCLUDING AN ORDER AS TO BE ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioners seeks the following reliefs:
"i. Issue a writ of mandamus, or any order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to issue refund in terms of the revised submitted by them for the assessment year 2018-2019 dated 24/11/2023 vide Annexure-C & C1 dated 24/11/2023 with interest for delayed refund from 31/12/2024 till the date of actual payment, the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to issue refund in terms of the revised submitted by them for the assessment year 2018-2019 dated 24/11/2023 vide Annexure-C & C1 dated 24/11/2023 with interest for delayed refund from 31/12/2024 till the date of actual payment,
ii. Pass any such order or direction as this Hon'ble court deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, including an order as to be issued by the petitioner."
2. Heard Sri.Ravi L Vaidya learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri.M.Dilip learned AGA appearing for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the repeated representations/requests made by the petitioners at Annexures-D and D1 dated 26.02.2024 Annexures-E and E1 dated 04.04.2024, Annexures-F and F1 dated 30.04.2024 and Annexures-G and G1 dated 08.08.2024 seeking refund of the excess tax paid by the petitioners has not been considered by the respondents, petitioners are before this Court by way of the present petition.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that if reasonable time is granted, respondents would consider the aforesaid representations i.e., Annexures-D and D1 dated 26.02.2024, Annexures-E and E1 dated 04.04.2024, Annexures-F and F1 dated 30.04.2024 and Annexures-G and G1
dated 08.08.2024 and take appropriate decision/pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that if reasonable time is granted, respondents would consider the aforesaid representations i.e., Annexures-D and D1 dated 26.02.2024, Annexures-E and E1 dated 04.04.2024, Annexures-F and F1 dated 30.04.2024 and Annexures-G and G1
dated 08.08.2024 and take appropriate decision/pass appropriate order in accordance with law.
5. In view of the aforesaid said facts and circumstances and submission made by both sides, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of directing the concerned respondents to address the grievances of the petitioners and consider and pass appropriate orders/take appropriate decision on the aforesaid representations Annexures-D and D1 dated 26.02.2024 Annexures-E and E1 dated 04.04.2024, Annexures-F and F1 dated 30.04.2024 and Annexures-G and G1 dated 08.08.2024 bearing in mind Annexures-A dated 09.08.2023, Annexures-B and B1 dated 09.11.2023 and Annexures-C and C1 dated 24.11.2023 and pass appropriate order/take appropriate decision within a period of one month from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Subject to the aforesaid directions, petition is disposed of.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
DS CT: TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.