B.gopi v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
09 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
B.gopi v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In B.gopi v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 09.08.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESHW.P.No.18421 of 2009
andM.P.Nos.1 of 2009 & 1 of 2014
B.Gopi ...Petitioner
Vs
1. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy – 620001.
2. Income Tax Officer, Ward No.1(5), Salem.
...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, praying to issue a writ of CertiorarifiedMandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings ofthe 1[st]respondent dated 26.06.2009 in C.No.995(36)/PROSN/CCIP/Trichy and quash the same and direct the respondentsto compound the alleged offences under Section 279(2) of theIncome Tax Act, the subject matter of the Crl.R.C.No.1461 of2006.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mani
For Respondents: Mr.ANR.Jaya Prathap, JSC
The petitioner's request for compounding of offences underSection 279(2) of the Income Tax Act, which came to be rejectedthrough the impugned order dated 26.06.2009, is under challengein this writ petition.
2. It is represented that pending the writ petition, thepetitioner herein had filed a Criminal Revision Case No.1461 of2006 before this Court challenging the conviction of thepetitioner under Sections 276 and 277 of the Income Tax Act andthis Court, by an order dated 11.04.2014, while rejecting therevision, gave liberty to the petitioner to approach theDepartment with an application for compounding of offences. When
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
the petitioner had subsequently approached the ChiefCommissioner of Income Tax, Trichy with a petition dated11.07.2014, the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax had passedorders on 21.08.2015 for compounding the offences under Sections276 and 277 committed by the assessee in respect of theassessment year 1996-97. As such, no effective orders can bepassed in the present writ petition, since the petitioner'sgrievance has been met. It is needless to point out that in viewof the compounding order, the petitioner need not undergo anyimprisonment.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. No costs.Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarhvkTo1. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, No.44, Williams Road, Cantonment, Trichy – 620001.2. Income Tax Officer, Ward No.1(5), Salem.
+1cc to Mr.P.Mani, Advocate sr.68281+1cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Advocate Sr.68914
W.P.No.18421 of 2009andM.P.Nos.1 of 2009 & 1 of 2014
nr[co]srg 20/09/2019
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.