Bhagirathi Udyog v. Ito Ward 1(3), Office Of Income Tax Officer Income Taxdepartment Jaipur
High Court
29 Nov 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Bhagirathi Udyog v. Ito Ward 1(3), Office Of Income Tax Officer Income Taxdepartment Jaipur
Date of order
29 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Bhagirathi Udyog v. Ito Ward 1(3), Office Of Income Tax Officer Income Taxdepartment Jaipur, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13836/2022
Bhagirathi Udyog 1, Gopinath Marg, Behind GPO, Jaipur 302001,Rajasthan Through Partner Ruchi Agarwal.
----Petitioner
Versus
ITO Ward 1(3), Office Of Income Tax Officer Income TaxDepartment Jaipur 302001, Rajasthan.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Ranka, AdvocateFor Respondent(s): Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Advocate with
Mr. N.S. Bhati, Advocate
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Judgment / Order
29/11/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stagewhen the case comes up for hearing, the petition is renderedinfructuous.
In view of the above, this petition is disposed off as havingbeen rendered infructuous.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Mohita /128
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue