Case Law › High Court › Bhagwan Dass v. Commissioner Of Income-T...

Bhagwan Dass v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Patiala And Another

High Court 18 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

18 Feb 2020

Assessment year(s)

1986-87

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Bhagwan Dass v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Patiala And Another, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: Whether speaking/ reasoneda.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 260A case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

444IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH RRR ITA No.20 of 2002Date of Decision: 18.02.2020 Bhagwan Dass Versus Appellant Commissioner of Income-tax, Patiala and another| Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN Present:Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocatefor the appellant, Mr. Jitin Kohli, Advocate for|Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocatefor the respondent. AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) '''' ()*This appeal was filed under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Chandigarh in ITA No.552/Chandi/93 for the assessment year 1986-87. (,*Learned counsel for the appellant states that he has noinstructions. Even otherwise, we find that amount involved is paltry.(4*Dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to revive theappeal if something survives therein,(:*since the main case is dismissed, the pending application,if any, stands disposed of. JUDGE February 18, 2020panka] baweja I. Whether speaking/ reasoneda. Whether reportable JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.