Case LawHigh Court › Bhanwar Lal v. Principal Commissioner Of...

Bhanwar Lal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-2

High Court 07 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Bhanwar Lal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-2
Date of order
07 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Bhanwar Lal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-2, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: Therefore, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to thepetitioner to avail lawful alternative remedy available if so advised.Registry is directed to return the certified copies of theorder/documents and Vakalatnama annexed with the presentpetition to the petitioner upon furnishing true ph...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1050/2019 Bhanwar Lal S/o Shri Arun Sahay Versus Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-2 ----Petitioner ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth RankaFor Respondent(s): Mr. Arvind Kumar Chawla, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIAOrder 07/03/2019 Counsel for the petitioner has contended that qua thedemand raised for assessment year 2006-2007 prosecutionsanction has been granted by the Principal Commissioner ofIncome-Tax Jaipur-2. Admittedly, at this juncture, criminal proceedings havenot been initiated against the petitioner and they are not pendingin any court. Petitioner is aggrieved against the order wherebyprosecution sanction has been granted by Principal Commissionerof Income-Tax Jaipur-2. Grant of prosecution sanction is anadministrative act on the part of Principal Commissioner ofIncome-Tax Jaipur-2. The remedy for the petitioner is to file a writ petitionunder Article 226 of Constitution of India praying therein that awrit in the nature of certiorari be issued and order grantingprosecution sanction be quashed. Until any criminal proceedingsare initiated this court cannot exercise jurisdiction under Section482 Cr.P.C. to determine the validity of an administrative action. Therefore, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to thepetitioner to avail lawful alternative remedy available if so advised.Registry is directed to return the certified copies of theorder/documents and Vakalatnama annexed with the presentpetition to the petitioner upon furnishing true photostat copiesthereof by counsel for the petitioner. (KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),J Heena/73
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan