In Bhanwar Lal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-2, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: Therefore, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to thepetitioner to avail lawful alternative remedy available if so advised.Registry is directed to return the certified copies of theorder/documents and Vakalatnama annexed with the presentpetition to the petitioner upon furnishing true ph...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1050/2019
Bhanwar Lal S/o Shri Arun Sahay
Versus
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Jaipur-2
----Petitioner
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth RankaFor Respondent(s): Mr. Arvind Kumar Chawla, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIAOrder
07/03/2019
Counsel for the petitioner has contended that qua thedemand raised for assessment year 2006-2007 prosecutionsanction has been granted by the Principal Commissioner ofIncome-Tax Jaipur-2.
Admittedly, at this juncture, criminal proceedings havenot been initiated against the petitioner and they are not pendingin any court. Petitioner is aggrieved against the order wherebyprosecution sanction has been granted by Principal Commissionerof Income-Tax Jaipur-2. Grant of prosecution sanction is anadministrative act on the part of Principal Commissioner ofIncome-Tax Jaipur-2.
The remedy for the petitioner is to file a writ petitionunder Article 226 of Constitution of India praying therein that awrit in the nature of certiorari be issued and order grantingprosecution sanction be quashed. Until any criminal proceedingsare initiated this court cannot exercise jurisdiction under Section482 Cr.P.C. to determine the validity of an administrative action.
Therefore, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to thepetitioner to avail lawful alternative remedy available if so advised.Registry is directed to return the certified copies of theorder/documents and Vakalatnama annexed with the presentpetition to the petitioner upon furnishing true photostat copiesthereof by counsel for the petitioner.
(KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA),J
Heena/73
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.