Case Law › High Court › Bharat Singh v. The State Of Chhattisgar...

Bharat Singh v. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Collector, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Chhattisgarh

High Court 09 Mar 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

09 Mar 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Bharat Singh v. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Collector, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPURWrit Petition (227) No. 728 of 2015 Bharat Singh S/o Late Khushrang Singh, Aged About 70 Years Caste Kshatray, R/o Opposite Way Of Income Tax Office, Bhartiya Nagar, Bilaspur, Police Station Civil Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Collector, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) (Chhattisgarh) 2. The Land Acquisition Officer ( Sub- Divisional Officer Revenue) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 3. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 4. The State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Director, Urban Administration & Development Department, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) Administration & Development Department, Mantralaya, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For the Petitioner :None.For Respondents No.1, 2 & 4/ State :Ms. M. Asha, Panel Lawyer.For Respondent No.3:None though represented. Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order on Board 09/03/2016 (1)No one appears on behalf of the Petitioner even when the case is taken up for hearing in second round. (2)In view of above, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this W.P. (227) for want of prosecution. (3)Accordingly, W.P. (227) is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai)JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.