Bharatbhai Kanjibhai Kakadiya v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
05 Jan 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Bharatbhai Kanjibhai Kakadiya v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
05 Jan 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Bharatbhai Kanjibhai Kakadiya v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17507 of 2019
=========================================================
=
BHARATBHAI KANJIBHAI KAKADIYA VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. HARDIK V VORA(7123) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the Respondent(s) No. 1==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
andHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Date : 05/01/2021
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Mr. Hardik Vora, the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicant submits that, the notice issued by the Department under Section 153 C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been withdrawn and in such circumstances, he would not like to proceed further with this matter. As the proceedings have been dropped, no further adjudication of this writ application is now required.
In such circumstances, this writ application stands disposed of as having become infructuous. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
SUCHIT
(ILESH J. VORA,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.