Case LawHigh Court › Bhartidevi Sarabhai Trust v. Commissione...

Bhartidevi Sarabhai Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 31 Jan 1997 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Bhartidevi Sarabhai Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
31 Jan 1997
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Bhartidevi Sarabhai Trust v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (1997) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- BHARTIDEVI SARABHAI TRUST NO.2 Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR D.A.

Decision: We therefore, do not answer the question referred to us and the reference stands disposed of. ----

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 103 of 1984 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? -------------------------------------------------------------- BHARTIDEVI SARABHAI TRUST NO.2 Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR D.A. MEHTA, MR R.K. PATEL, MR. B.D. KARIA FOR MR KC PATEL for Petitioner MR BHARAT J. SHELAT instructed by MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI and �� MR.JUSTICE R.BALIA. Date of decision: 31/01/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT (R.K.Abichandani,J.) �The learned counsel for the assessee submits that he has instructions from the assessee not to press for the opinion of this Court on the question referred to this Court and therefore, he does not press for this reference. We therefore, do not answer the question referred to us and the reference stands disposed of. ----
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan