In Bhaskar Plastics Pvt Ltd v. Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Assessment, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 5 [Whether it is to be circulated to the ]civil judge ?civil judge ? ========================================================= BHASKAR PLASTICS PVT LTD Versus DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (ASSESSMENT) ========================================================= Appearance :MR MANISH J.
Decision: The petition is rejected as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7838 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI
========================================================= 1 [Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be ]allowed to see the judgment ?1 [Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be ]allowed to see the judgment ?
2To be referred to the Reporter or not ?
3 [Whether their Lordships wish to see the ]fair copy of the judgment ?fair copy of the judgment ?
Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation question of law as to the interpretation 4of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?
5 [Whether it is to be circulated to the ]civil judge ?civil judge ?
========================================================= BHASKAR PLASTICS PVT LTD
Versus
DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (ASSESSMENT)
=========================================================
Appearance :MR MANISH J. SHAH for MR JP SHAH for Petitioner.MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent.
=========================================================
CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA)
Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition, under instructions, in light of the fact that there is an order made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in favour of the petitioner.
Permission as sought for is granted. The petition is rejected as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. Interim Relief stands vacated.
[D.A.MEHTA, J.]
mathew
[H.B.ANTANI, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.