Case LawHigh Court › Bhogwati Ssk Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of I...

Bhogwati Ssk Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 26 Mar 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Bhogwati Ssk Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
26 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Bhogwati Ssk Ltd v. Dy.commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1717 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.695 OF 2004 Bhogwati SSK Ltd., ..Appellant Versus Dy.Commissioner of Income-tax ..Respondents ---- Mr.A.K.Jasani & Mr.S.N.Inamdar for the appellant. Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 26th March, 2008. PC 1. There is a delay of 126 days. Considering the cause shown delay condoned subject to the appellant paying to the respondent cost as quantified at Rs.5000/- within six weeks from today. On such cost being paid, office objections to be removed. Office to register the appeal. INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.695 OF 2004 . Considering that the questions are answered in favour of the assessee, appeal allowed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J) (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan