Bhopal (M.p v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Badora, District Betul (M.p
High Court
25 Nov 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Bhopal (M.p v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Badora, District Betul (M.p
Date of order
25 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
2003-04
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Bhopal (M.p v. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Badora, District Betul (M.p, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Issue: (ii) Whether the Tribunal was right in granting registration under Section 12-A to the assessee inspite of the fact that the assessee had the status of local authority before the amendment made in Section 10(20) and 10(29) of the IT Act w.e.f.
Decision: Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Raheli, District Sagar), where the appeal has been dismissed, this appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: JABALPUR
(Division Bench)
M.A.I.T.No.175/2007
Commissioner of Income Tax,
Bhopal (M.P.)
...Appellant/Revenue
Versus
Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Badora, District Betul (M.P.)
...Respondent/assessee
Coram
Hon’ble Shri Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Justice Mohd. Fahim Anwar, Judge
Appearance
Shri Sanjay Lal, Advocate for the appellant/Revenue.
O R D E R
(25.11.2019)
Per: Ajay Kumar Mittal, C.J. (Oral)
The Revenue has filed this appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore passed in I.T.A.No.317/Ind/2007 dated 18.5.2007 directing registration of the assessee-Krishi Upaj Mandi under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. This appeal was admitted on 9.1.2007 for determination of the following
substantial questions of law:-
“(i) Whether the Tribunal was right in granting registration under Section 12-A following the decision of ITAT ‘A’ Bench, Delhi in the case of Market Committee, Sular Gharat & others V/s CIT and also the ITAT Nagpur ‘A’ Bench in the case of Agricultural Produce Delhiwithout going into the merits of the order under Section 12-AA of the IT Act by CIT?
(ii) Whether the Tribunal was right in granting registration under Section 12-A to the assessee inspite of the fact that the assessee had the status of local authority before the amendment made in Section 10(20) and 10(29) of the IT Act w.e.f. A.Y. 2003-04 and also later on and thereby allowing exemption under Section 11 of the IT Act?
(iii) Whether the activities of the trust not having been changed, whether the assessee can be treated as a charitable institution in the light of the finding given in the order under Section 12-AA(i)(b)(ii)?”
3. It was not disputed by the learned counsel for the revenue that detailed
order passed in M.A.I.T.No.114/2007 (The Commissioner of Income Tax-II,
Jabalpur Vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Raheli, District Sagar) on
21.11.2019 would govern the decision of this appeal. Accordingly, in view of the order dated 21.11.2019 passed in M.A.I.T.No.114/2007 (The Commissioner of
Income Tax-II, Jabalpur Vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Raheli, District Sagar), where the appeal has been dismissed, this appeal is also dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Chief Justice
C.
(Mohd. Fahim Anwar) Judge
Digitally signed by CHRISTOPHER PHILIP Date: 2020.01.27 16:58:42 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.