Bhudarbhai Lavjibhai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
10 Feb 2000 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Bhudarbhai Lavjibhai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
10 Feb 2000
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Bhudarbhai Lavjibhai v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2000) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence the petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 5279 of 1994
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT and
MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- BHUDARBHAI LAVJIBHAIVersus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MR HM TALATI for Petitioner
MR BB NAIK WITH MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE J.N.BHATT and MR.JUSTICE C.K.BUCH
Date of decision: 10/02/2000
ORAL JUDGEMENT(Per J.N.Bhatt, J.)
In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, this Court is not inclined to entertain the
petition for the following grounds:
(i) Smallness of the amount involved;
(ii) Laches and acquiescence on the part of the
petitioner in view of the fact that the orders,
firstly, were recorded by the Commissioner of
Income Tax, granting relief of assessment years
1978-79 and 1979-80 while rejecting the
application for the assessment years 1975-76 and
1977-78, on 26.10.88. Again review application
was filed which came to be decided on 21.12.93.
In the circumstances, exercise extra-ordinary, plenary,
discretionary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not called for in the present case. Hence the petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No costs.
���......
(vjn)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.