In Bhushan v. And V.c.daga, Jj, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 997 OF 2008
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 997 OF 2008
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 997 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 384 OF 2005
INCOME TAXAPPEAL (LDG.) NO. 384 OF 2005
INCOME TAX
INCOME TAX
The Dnyaneshwarnagar Sahakari
Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. ... Appellant.
V/s.
The Deputy Commissioner of
Income-Tax (Spl-3), Nashik & ors. ... Respondents.
Bhushan V. Mahadik for the appellant.
Mrs.Devki Iyer i/b. Vimal Gupta for the respondents.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
and V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED : 6th October 2008.
DATED : 6th October 2008.
P.C. :
P.C. :----
----
. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and
learned counsel for the respondent.
2. By this chamber summons the appellant is
seeking to amend the memo of appeal as per the
schedule annexed to the chamber summons. Perused
affidavit in support to the chamber summons. For the
reasons stated therein, chamber summons is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to
be carried out within a period of two weeks from
today.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.