Case LawHigh Court › Bihar & Jharkhand, Central Revenue Build...

Bihar & Jharkhand, Central Revenue Building, Patna v. Anand Akhilanand Khalkho

High Court 28 Sep 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Bihar & Jharkhand, Central Revenue Building, Patna v. Anand Akhilanand Khalkho
Date of order
28 Sep 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Bihar & Jharkhand, Central Revenue Building, Patna v. Anand Akhilanand Khalkho, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In view of the prayer, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1834 of 2017 The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (CCA), Bihar & Jharkhand, Central Revenue Building, Patna Versus --- --- Petitioner Anand Akhilanand Khalkho, R/o Hazaribag --- --- Respondent 1.The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi-1 Finance, Govt. of India, New Delhi-1 2.The Central Board of Direct Taxes through the Chairman, Dept. of Revenue, New Delhi of Revenue, New Delhi 3.The Under Secretary to the Government, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Dept. of Revenue, New Delhi ---- ---- Proforma Respondents ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGHHON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY Through Video Conferencing For the Petitioner For the UOI : Ms. Amrita Sinha, Advocate : Ms. Shresha Sinha, A.C. to ASGI 08/28.09.2020 Learned counsel for the petitioner Ms. Amrita Sinha seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition, on instructions, with a liberty to the petitioners to comply the order dated 15.03.2016 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Circuit Bench, Ranchi in O.A. No. 051/00078/2014 where under the respondent therein / writ petitioner herein were directed to dispose of the representation of the applicant dated 11.03.2014. In view of the prayer, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to say, petitioner Department is at liberty to pass an appropriate order on the representation of the applicant, as directed by the learned CAT vide order dated 15.03.2016. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan