Case LawHigh Court › Bihar Natraheen Parishad, Patna Near Pan...

Bihar Natraheen Parishad, Patna Near Panchsheel High School; P.o. Lohiya Nagar, Kumhrar, Patna v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, 2[Nd] Floor, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Path, Patna

High Court 29 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Bihar Natraheen Parishad, Patna Near Panchsheel High School; P.o. Lohiya Nagar, Kumhrar, Patna v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, 2[Nd] Floor, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Path, Patna
Date of order
29 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Bihar Natraheen Parishad, Patna Near Panchsheel High School; P.o. Lohiya Nagar, Kumhrar, Patna v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, 2[Nd] Floor, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Path, Patna, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Subject to the above observation, the petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.11650 of 2011 ====================================================== Bihar Natraheen Parishad, Patna Near Panchsheel High School; P.O. Lohiya Nagar, Kumhrar, Patna- 800026, through trustee member Dr.Ajit Sinha, Baldeo Sahay Path, Kadamkuan, Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, 2[nd] floor, Central Revenue Building, Birchand Patel Path, Patna- 800001. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Income Tax, Circle-1, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Sahay, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Advocate. Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Feeling aggrieved by the order dated 22[nd] September 2010 2 29-07-2011 made by the Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Patna on an application for renewal of approval under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Income tax Act, 1961, the Assessee, a charitable trust, has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. It appears that in spite of several notices given to the petitioner, the petitioner did not appear before the Commissioner of Income Tax/ Assessing Officer to satisfy the Commissioner of Income Tax that the conditions referred to in Section 80G (5) of the Income tax Act, 1961 were satisfied. Hence, the application made by the petitioner was rejected. The petitioner may apply for renewal of approval under Section 80G (5) (vi) of the Income tax Act, 1961 afresh with all relevant materials. If such application is made, the same will be considered by the Commissioner, Income Tax-1, Patna inaccordance with law. Subject to the above observation, the petition is dismissed. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) B Tiwary/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan