Case LawHigh Court › Bihar Rajya Sahakari Bhumi Vikas Bank Si...

Bihar Rajya Sahakari Bhumi Vikas Bank Simit v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patna

High Court 29 Jul 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Bihar Rajya Sahakari Bhumi Vikas Bank Simit v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patna
Date of order
29 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Bihar Rajya Sahakari Bhumi Vikas Bank Simit v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patna, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA C. REV. No.249 of 2008 Bihar Rajya Sahakari Bhumi Vikas Bank Simit, Registered office under Bihar & Orissa Co-operative Society act (vi of 1935) having its registered office at Budh Marg, Patna ..... Appellant- Petitioner VERSUS 1. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patna 2. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax special Range-1 Patna Redeginated as Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1 Patna .... Respondent- Opp. Parties WITH C.REV No.250 of 2008 Bihar Rajya Sahakari Bhumi Vikas Bank Simit, Registered office under Bihar & Orissa Co-operative Society act (vi of 1935) having its registered office at Budh Marg, Patna ..... Appellant- Petitioner VERSUS 1. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patna 2. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax special Range-1 Patna Redeginated as Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1 Patna .... Respondent- Opp. Parties -------- For the Petitioner : Dr R.Usha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr Harshwardhan Prasad, Sr SC Mr Archana Sinha, JSC For the Respondents : Mr Harshwardhan Prasad, Sr SC ----- 29.7.2009 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Income Tax Department and its officials. On behalf of the petitioner it has been submitted that the judgment under review has been delivered by the Division Bench on wrong appreciation of judgments cited and contrary to views of the Supreme Court. On behalf of the respondents the aforesaid submission has been refuted and it has been further submitted that the judgment was passed in a sk Miscellaneous Appeal preferred under section 260 of the Income Tax Act against which only an appeal can be preferred under section 261 before the Apex Court and there is no provision of review of the appellate order in the Income Tax Act which is a Code by itself. On going through the judgment under review and after noticing the rival submissions, we do not find merit in these review applications. They are accordingly dismissed. (Shiva Kirti Singh, ACJ) (Dr Ravi Ranjan, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan