Bits N Bytes Soft Private Limited v. Lakshmi Kumaran, Advocate With Mr. S. Vasudevan, Advocate
High Court
24 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Bits N Bytes Soft Private Limited v. Lakshmi Kumaran, Advocate With Mr. S. Vasudevan, Advocate
Date of order
24 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Bits N Bytes Soft Private Limited v. Lakshmi Kumaran, Advocate With Mr. S. Vasudevan, Advocate, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal.
Decision: 4.With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition and application stand disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Signature Not Verified
$~20
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 14955/2021
BITS N BYTES SOFT PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. V. Lakshmi Kumaran, Advocate with Mr. S. Vasudevan, Advocate.
versus
PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 1 & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Advocate.
Date of Decision: 24[th] December, 2021
%
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
J U D G M E N T
MANMOHAN, J (Oral):
CM Appl. 47228/2021 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, present application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 14955/2021 & CM Appl. 47227/2021
1.Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 15th November, 2021 passed by respondent No.1 under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) for Assessment Year 2017-18. Petitioner also seeks directions to the respondents not to treat the petitioner as an assessee in default and to waive the condition of pre-deposit
W.P. (C) 14955/2021 Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
of 15% of the disputed demand as has been imposed under the impugned order dated 15[th] November, 2021.
2.Keeping in view the fact that by virtue of the impugned orders an interim arrangement has been put in place by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), this Court finds no reason to interfere with the discretion exercised by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
3.However, in view of the peculiar facts of the present case, this Court directs the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner within three months of receipt of this order. It is clarified that this Court has not commented on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.
4.With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition and application stand disposed of. However, list the matter for compliance on 09[th] May, 2022.
MANMOHAN, J
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
DECEMBER 24, 2021 js
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.