Biyani Shikshan Samiti v. The Union Of India
High Court
16 Feb 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Biyani Shikshan Samiti v. The Union Of India
Date of order
16 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Biyani Shikshan Samiti v. The Union Of India, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 5.The petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1994/2024
Biyani Shikshan Samiti, Through Its Authorized RepresentativeDr. Rajeev Biyani, Having Address At R 4, Biyani Girls College,Sector 3, Vidyadhar Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India- 302029.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Ministry OfFinance, Income Tax Department, North Block, New DelhiFinance, Income Tax Department, North Block, New Delhi
2. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Through NationalFaceless Appeal Centre, Room No. 245-A, North Block,New Delhi.Faceless Appeal Centre, Room No. 245-A, North Block,New Delhi.
3. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)Jaipur, Having Its Registered Address At 3Rd Floor,Kailash Heights, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road Jaipur - 302005.Jaipur, Having Its Registered Address At 3Rd Floor,Kailash Heights, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road Jaipur - 302005.
----Respondents
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
16/02/2024
-AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (ORAL):
1.This petition is filed seeking directions for an expeditiousdisposal of the pending appeal of the petitioner.
2.It is pleaded in the petition that the appeal relating toassessment years 2014-15 to 2017-18 are pending for four yearsand more.
3.After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and from theperusal of the writ petition, it is forthcoming that no such request
has been made to the officer concerned. No case is made out forinterference in the writ jurisdiction.
4.However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach theoffice of the officer concerned with a request for expeditiousdisposal of the appeal. There is no doubt in the eventuality of thepetitioner making such a prayer, the same shall be considered inaccordance with law as expeditiously as possible.
5.The petition is dismissed with liberty as prayed for.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Naval Kishore-RAHUL/9
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.