Bombay City Ii, Bombay v. M/S.re-Union Engg.pvt.ltd
High Court
20 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Bombay City Ii, Bombay v. M/S.re-Union Engg.pvt.ltd
Date of order
20 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Bombay City Ii, Bombay v. M/S.re-Union Engg.pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Issue: On 1.8.2006 Mr.Kotangale had taken one week’s time to verify whether the Department has filed Income Tax Application with regard to the earlier orders as the present order refers to the earlier orders.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.32 OF 2001
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.32 OF 2001
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.32 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Bombay City II, Bombay .. Appellant
V/s
M/s.Re-union Engg.Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the Appellant.
Mr.S.S.Shetty for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 20th March, 2007.
DATE : 20th March, 2007.
DATE : 20th March, 2007.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. On 1.8.2006 Mr.Kotangale had taken one week’s time
to verify whether the Department has filed Income Tax
Application with regard to the earlier orders as the
present order refers to the earlier orders.
Mr.Kotangale fairly states that till date there are no
instructions from the Department with regard to the
earlier orders. Hence, there is no material on record
to indicate that those orders were at all challenged.
Hence, Income Tax Application stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.