Bombay City-Iv, Bombay v. M/S.panchsheel Pllyster Pvt.ltd
High Court
17 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Bombay City-Iv, Bombay v. M/S.panchsheel Pllyster Pvt.ltd
Date of order
17 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Bombay City-Iv, Bombay v. M/S.panchsheel Pllyster Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.28 of 2006
The Commissioner of Income-tax, )
Bombay City-IV, Bombay, )..APPELLANT
Versus
M/s.Panchsheel Pllyster Pvt.Ltd...Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterji with Mrs.P.P. Bhosale
and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 27TH FEBRUARY,2008
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 27TH FEBRUARY,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The issues which arise in this Appeal are
the same or similar to what was in issue in Income
Tax Appeal No.1393 of 2000. For the reasons set out
while disposing of the Income Tax Appeal No.1393 of
2000 decided today i.e. 27th February, 2008 the
question of law as framed in this Appeal would not
arise and consequently appeal dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE,
(R.S.MOHITE,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue