Bombay City-Iv, Bombay v. Ricolene Syntex Pvt. Ltd
High Court
27 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Bombay City-Iv, Bombay v. Ricolene Syntex Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
27 Feb 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Bombay City-Iv, Bombay v. Ricolene Syntex Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.494 of 2007
The Commissioner of Income-tax, )
Bombay City-IV, Bombay, )..APPELLANT
Versus
Ricolene Syntex Pvt. Ltd. ....Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterji with Mr. R.G. Bhat
and Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the appellant.
Mr. A.K.Jasani, for respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 27TH FEBRUARY,2008
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 27TH FEBRUARY,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The issues which arise in this Appeal are the same or similar to what was in issue in Income Tax Appeal No.1393 of 2000. For the reasons set out while disposing of the Income Tax Appeal No.1393 of 2000 decided today i.e. 27th February, 2008 the
while disposing of the Income Tax Appeal No.1393 of 2000 decided today i.e. 27th February, 2008 the question of law as framed in this Appeal would not
arise and consequently appeal dismissed.
(R.S.MOHITE,
(R.S.MOHITE,J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue