Bombay City Xi v. M/S Ramnord Research Lab. P.ltd
High Court
11 Apr 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Bombay City Xi v. M/S Ramnord Research Lab. P.ltd
Date of order
11 Apr 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Bombay City Xi v. M/S Ramnord Research Lab. P.ltd, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE.
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2961 OF 2001.
IN
Income-tax Appeal (L) No.723 of 2001.
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Bombay City XI. ..Appellant.
vs.
M/s Ramnord Research Lab. P.Ltd. ..Respondent.
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
CORAM: V.C.DAGA &
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
DATED: 11-4-2005.
P.C.
1. This Motion was before us on 12.2.2004. On
that day, conditional self-operative order was passed
which reads as under :
"8. Having heard parties, by way of
last chance time is granted to the
Revenue to file further and better
affidavit upto 1st March 2004 with
copy to the other side, failure on
their part to file proper and better
affidavits in all these motions, the
same shall stand automatically
dismissed, without any further
reference to this Court, with no order
as to costs.
9. In the event, proper and better
affidavits are filed, the matter be
placed on board on 4th March 2004 for
further hearing.
10. S.O. to 4th March 2004."
In view of the aforesaid order; it was incumbent upon
the respondent to file proper and better affidavit
upto 4th March 2004. However, such affidavit appears
to have been filed subsequent to 9th March, 2004.
Since additional affidavit has not been filed within
the time prescribed, motion has resulted in
automatical dismissal in view of the conditional
self-operative order. In this view of the matter, as
on date, this motion is not alive. Order accordingly.
. Appeal papers be cosigned to record.
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J.) (V.C.DAGA,J.)
********
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.