Brakes Agency v. Income Tax Officer Ward 35(5), Delhi & Ors
High Court
25 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Brakes Agency v. Income Tax Officer Ward 35(5), Delhi & Ors
Date of order
25 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Brakes Agency v. Income Tax Officer Ward 35(5), Delhi & Ors, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~47 & 48
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7293/2023 & CM APPL. 28346/2023
RAVINDER KAUR (ERSTWHILE PARTNER OF AUTO
BRAKES AGENCY)
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nitin Gulati and Ms. Reena Gandhi, Advs.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 35(5), DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, SSC with Ms. Sakshi Shairwal, JSC.
48
+ W.P.(C) 7330/2023, CM APPL. 28519/2023 RAVINDER KAUR
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Nitin Gulati and Ms. Reena Gandhi, Advs.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 35(5), DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Vipul Agrawal, SSC with
Ms. Sakshi Shairwal, JSC.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R25.02.2025
%
1.We are informed that insofar as the reassessment of Auto Brakes Agency, the erstwhile partnership, is concerned the same is still pending consideration of the Assessing Officer. However, the individual writ petitioner, who is stated to have taken over the
business of the partnership firm, had also faced a reassessment action which has ultimately concluded in the passing of an order dated 03 February 2025, with no additions having been made.
2.Awaiting closure of proceedings against the erstwhile firm, let W.P.(C) 7293/2023 be called again on 02.04.2025.
3.In light of the order dated 03 February 2025 passed, W.P.(C) 7330/2023 is rendered infructuous. It is, accordingly, disposed of as such.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
FEBRUARY 25, 2025/akc
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.