Case Law › High Court › B.rmakrishnaiah v. The Income Tax Office...

B.rmakrishnaiah v. The Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad And Three Others

High Court 14 Jun 2010 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

14 Jun 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In B.rmakrishnaiah v. The Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad And Three Others, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn, without goinginto merits.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN W.P.NO.21029 OF 2009 (PERTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.PRAKASH RAO) DT.14.06.2010 Between: B.Rmakrishnaiah ………………Petitioner Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Hyderabad and three others ……………..Respondents. JUDGMENT: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this courtto withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn, without goinginto merits. No order as to costs. __________________ B.PRAKASH RAO J., Dt.14.06.2010tjs ___________________________ RAMESH RANGANATHAN J.,

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.