Case LawHigh Court › B.somasundaram v. The Joint Commissioner...

B.somasundaram v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle, Central Range

High Court 22 Aug 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
B.somasundaram v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle, Central Range
Date of order
22 Aug 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In B.somasundaram v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle, Central Range, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: This writ petition stands dismissed with the above observations.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.No.24741 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated: 22.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P.No.24741 of 2023andW.M.P.Nos.24182 and 24183 of 2023 B.Somasundaram ... Petitioner vs. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle, Central Range,63, Race Course Road,Coimbatore - 641 018. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorari of any other appropriate Writ Order or Direction, calling for the records relating to Notice issued in DIN & Notice No.ITBA/PNL/S/271D/2022-23/1050219037(1) dated 28.02.2023, and consequential notice in DIN & Letter No.ITBA/PNL/F/17/2023-24/1055002549(1) dated 09.08.2023, on the file of the respondent and quash the same. W.P.No.24741 of 2023 For Petitioner: Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan For Respondent: Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap Senior Standing Counsel ORDER Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, learned Senior Standing Counsel takes notice on behalf of the respondent. 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned notice issued under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The impugned Show Cause Notice has been issued to the petitioner for violation of Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. It is the specific case of the petitioner is that the notice is vague and that already a regular Assessment order has been passed on 31.12.2019, wherein, proposals were made for imposing penalty under Sections 270A, 271A, 271B and 271AAC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.It is submitted that the petitioner is in appeal, asfar as the Assessment order dated 31.12.219 is concerned. W.P.No.24741 of 2023 4. It is further submitted that the Assessment order dated 31.12.2019 was later revised by invoking provisions of Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and another Assessment order has been passed on 20.03.2022, wherein, there is no proposal for imposing any penalty on the petitioner. It is further submitted that since the notice is vague, questioning of proposing imposition of penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is without any merits. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has relied on the following decisions:- (i)Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jaya Lakshmi Rice Mills, Ambala City reported in (2015) 64 Taxmann.com 75 (SC); (ii)Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Standard Brands reported in [2006] 285 ITR 295 (Delhi); (iii)Diwan Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in [2000] 246 ITR 571 (Delhi); (iv)Director of Income-Tax (Exemptions), Chennai Vs. Young Men Christian Association reported in [2014] 227 Taxman 31 (Madras) and in [2014] 227 Taxman 31 (Madras) and (v)Srinivasa Reddy Reddeppagari Vs. Joint W.P.No.24741 of 2023 Commissioner of Income Tax in W.P.No.44285 of 2022 (Telangana High Court). 6. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent. 7. Show cause proceeding cannot be scuttled by filing a writ petition, as it is not without jurisdiction. It is open for the petitioner to reply to the Show Cause Notice and defend himself. Prima facie, it appears that the petitioner has violated provisions of Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and is therefore required to answer to the proposal contained the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 09.08.2023. Therefore, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed. The petitioner shall file such reply within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondent shall therefore dispose the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 09.08.2023 on merits and in accordance with law without getting influenced by any of the observations contained herein in this order within reasonable period. W.P.No.24741 of 2023 8. This writ petition stands dismissed with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. W.P.No.24741 of 2023 8. This writ petition stands dismissed with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. Index:Yes/NoInternet:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking OrderNeutral Citation : Yes/Nojas/ssa 22.08.2023 To The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle,Central Range,63,Race Course Road,Coimbatore-641 018. W.P.No.24741 of 2023 C.SARAVANAN, J. jas/ssa W.P.No.24741 of 2023 and W.M.P.Nos.24182 and 24183 of 2023 22.08.2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan