Burhani Family Trust v. Principle Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur And Others
High Court
22 Aug 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Burhani Family Trust v. Principle Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur And Others
Date of order
22 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Burhani Family Trust v. Principle Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur And Others, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 3985 OF 2024
Burhani Family Trust -- VERSUS -- Principle Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur and Others
__________________________________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
Ms. Rashi Deshpande, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE, AND M.M. NERLIKAR, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 22, 2025.
Heard for sometime.
2.
The prayer is for refund of return.
3.
The counsel for the respondents submits
that the order under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, has been passed on 29/01/2024.
4. The Assessing Officer has held that the refund is not payable to the assessee.
5.
The counsel for the petitioner submits
that this order was never supplied to the petitioner, and therefore, was unaware of the same. Accordingly, seeks permission to challenge the order before the appropriate forum. Leave granted.
Piyush Mahajan
2
6. The petitioner, if so desired, shall prefer appeal within four weeks from today. The appeal, if filed, shall be decided as expeditiously as possible and preferably within four months from the date of presentation of the appeal.
[ M.M. NERLIKAR, J ]
[ANIL.L. PANSARE, J ]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.