Business Process Outsourcing, Llc v. The Authority For Advance Rulings (Income Tax), Mumbai And Another
High Court
08 Mar 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Business Process Outsourcing, Llc v. The Authority For Advance Rulings (Income Tax), Mumbai And Another
Date of order
08 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Business Process Outsourcing, Llc v. The Authority For Advance Rulings (Income Tax), Mumbai And Another, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
VISHALSUBHASHPAREKAR
Digitally signed byVISHAL SUBHASHPAREKARDate: 2022.03.0918:33:14 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYAPPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8497 OF 2018
Business Process Outsourcing, LLC
...Petitioner
vs.The Authority For Advance Rulings(Income Tax), Mumbai and Another
...Respondents
Mr. Percy Pardiwala, Sr. Advocate a/w. Mr. Ashish Sodhani i/b.Nishith Desai Associates, for the Petitioner.Mrs. Shehnaz Bharucha, for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM :K.R. SHRIRAM &N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.DATE :MARCH 08, 2022
P.C.:
.Mr. Pardiwalla, for Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw thePetition in view of a message received on 17[th] February, 2022received by Petitioner from the International Tax Ward-1(3)(2),Mumbai which is taken on record and marked “X” for identification.Mr. Pardiwalla further states that by order dated 22[nd] March, 2019an amount of US Dollars 10 million was directed to be maintained inEscrow by Petitioner. Mr. Pardiwalla states in view of thecommunication dated 17[th] February, 2022 Petitioner be dischargedof the obligation to maintain US Dollars 10 million in Escrow andPetitioner be permitted to withdraw the US Dollars 10 million. Forcase of reference message dated 17[th] February, 2022 is scanned andre-produced below:
2.Ms. Bharucha states that Respondents have no objection and
relies on a message received by her yesterday 7[th] March, 2021which is taken on record and marked “X1” for identification. The
said message for case of reference is scanned and reproduced below.
3.In the circumstances, Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
4.Petitioner is discharged of its obligation to maintain USDollars 10 million in Escrow account and permitted to withdrawthe said amount together with interest, if any.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.