By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
High Court
14 Oct 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
14 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH OCTOBER 2009 / 22ND ASWINA 1931
WP(C).No. 25752 of 2009(L)
--------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
---------------
P.B.ABDUL BASHEER,PEEYES INDUSTRIES,
THOTTUPALAM,ERIMAYUR,PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
SMT.MEERA V.MENON
SRI.MAHESH V.MENON
RESPONDENT(S):
---------------
1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL
TAX OFFICER,ALATHUR.
2. TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY),TALUK OFFICE
ALATHUR.
GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.K. GOVINDAN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 14/10/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
S. Siri Jagan, J.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The petitioner is challenging Exts. P7 and P8 orders passed bythe 2[nd] respondent under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. When itwas pointed out to the learned counsel for the petitioner that againstExts.P7 and P8 orders, the petitioner has an effective alternateremedy by way of appeals, the petitioner seeks a breathing time tofile appeals and seek interim orders therein.
2. I have heard the learned Government Pleader also.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,I dispose of this writ petition without prejudice to the right of thepetitioner to challenge the impugned orders in appeals as providedunder the Kerala Value Added Tax Act. In order to enable thepetitioner to file appeals and seek interim orders therein from theappellate authority, I direct that the interim order passed in this writpetition shall continue to be in force for a period of three weeks.
Tds/
[True copy]
P.S to Judge.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.