Case Law › High Court › By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

High Court 14 Dec 2010 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

14 Dec 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM TUESDAY, THE 14TH DECEMBER 2010 / 23RD AGRAHAYANA 1932 RP.No. 1118 of 2010() --------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGEMENTIN WPC.33038/2010 Dated 01/11/2010 .................... REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:- -------------------------------------------------- A.M.ABDUL HAMEED,M/S.ARAFA TRADERS, SULTHAN BATHERY,WAYANAD DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:- -------------------------------------------- 1. AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX & COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, VAT CIRCLE, SULTHAN BATHERY. 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETRY TO GOVERNMENT, KERALA GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY SR.GOVT.PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/12/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J. = = = = = = = = = = = = = R.P.No.1118 of 2010 in WP(C).No.33038 of 2010-D.= = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 14[th] day of December, 2010. O R D E R Since the petitioner had filed a fresh writ petitionchallenging the issue raised in this Review Petition, heseeks permission to withdraw the Review Petition withoutprejudice to the right to pursue the writ petition filed. 2.Therefore, the Review Petition is dismissedwithout prejudice to the right of the petitioner to pursue thefresh writ petition filed by the petitioner. C.K.ABDUL REHIM, (Judge) Kvs/-

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.