By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH FEBRUARY 2010 / 28TH MAGHA 1931 WP(C).No. 5242 of 2010(E) ------------------------- PETITIONER(S): --------------- M/S.SHALOM CHARITABLE MINISTRIES OF INDIA,SHALOM NAGAR,GOPALAPURAM,CHITTUR,PALAKKAD REPRESENTEDBY JAYSON JOY.M.J,MANAGING TRUSTEE. BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.MEERA V.MENON SRI.MAHESH V.MENON RESPONDENT(S): --------------- 1. DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,PALAKKAD. 2. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.K.GOVINDAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/02/2010, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J. ----------------------------------------------- WP(C) No. 5242 of 2010 ------------------------------------- Dated, this the 17[th] day of February, 2010 J U D G M E N T Being aggrieved of Ext.P1 order passed by the first respondent, thepetitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal before the 2[nd] respondent, along withExt.P3 petition for stay. The grievance of the petitioner is that, it is withoutany regard to the pendency of the said proceedings that recovery steps havebeen initiated against the petitioner, which hence is under challenge in theWrit Petition. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respondents as well. 3.Considering the facts and circumstances, the second respondentis directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3, in accordancewith law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from thedate of receipt of a copy of this judgment. It is made clear that till suchappropriate orders are passed on Ext.P3, all further proceedings stated asbeing pursued against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENONJUDGE