By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
High Court
09 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
09 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 19TH JYAISHTA, 1942
WP(C).No.11270 OF 2020(G)
PETITIONER/S:
KECHERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDR-286, KECHERY P.O. THRISSUR 680 501, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.A. DAVIS, AGED 44, S/O. P.D. ANTHONY.
BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 1 AND TPS, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR 680 101.WARD 1 AND TPS, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR 680 101.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), AYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR 680 001.
3THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
AYAKAR BHAVAN, KAKKANADU, KOCHI 682 030, REPRESENTED
BY ITS REGISTRAR.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON09.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 9[th] day of June 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the thirdrespondent against the assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting onpayment of 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017.Till such time a decision is taken on the appeal, recoveryproceedings pursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED29.11.2019.
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2NDRESPONDENT FOR THE EYAR 2017-18 DATED 12.03.2020.
EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF APPEAL FIELD BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT 2017-18 DATED 01.05.2020.
EXHIBIT P4
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 01.05.2020.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.