Case Law › High Court › By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

High Court 03 Jul 2020 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

03 Jul 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL FRIDAY, THE 03RD DAY OF JULY 2020 / 12TH ASHADHA, 1942 WP(C).No.13281 OF 2020(I) PETITIONER/S: MADHUSOODANAN SADASIVAN1, AKHILAM AUDITORIUM , PEROORKADA, TRIVANDRUM-695005. BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2), AAYAKAR BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, KOWDIAR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003. 2THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR LA (GENERAL), MARAKKADA ROAD, CHALAI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695036. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON03.07.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Dated this the 3rd day of July 2020 Learned counsel for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted and the writpetition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE uu APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16.7.2018. EXHIBIT P2COPY OF RETURN FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED6.8.2018.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.