By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
High Court
04 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
04 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 14TH JYAISHTA, 1942WP(C).No.10989 OF 2020(W)
PETITIONER/S:
M/S. KAITHARAN AGENCIES,PUTHENVELIKARA.P.O, ERNAKULAM-683594, REPRESENTED BY K.T.DAISON,MANAGING PARTNER.
BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD 2,OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,ALUVA-683101.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),PANAMPILLY NAGAR,
ERNAKULAM,KOCHI-682036.
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON04.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.10989 OF 2020(W) ..2..
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 4th day of June 2020
Petitioner approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the 2ndrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)against the assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment without insisting on payment of 20% of the taxdemanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time adecision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance.
SB/05/06/2020
Sd/-AMIT RAWALJUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18
EXHIBIT P2
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT-2017-18
EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P4
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P5
COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.