Case LawHigh Court › By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

High Court 04 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
04 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL THURSDAY, THE 04TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 14TH JYAISHTA, 1942WP(C).No.10989 OF 2020(W) PETITIONER/S: M/S. KAITHARAN AGENCIES,PUTHENVELIKARA.P.O, ERNAKULAM-683594, REPRESENTED BY K.T.DAISON,MANAGING PARTNER. BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2,OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,ALUVA-683101. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),PANAMPILLY NAGAR, ERNAKULAM,KOCHI-682036. OTHER PRESENT: SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON04.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No.10989 OF 2020(W) ..2.. JUDGMENT Dated this the 4th day of June 2020 Petitioner approached this Court seeking a directionto dispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the 2ndrespondent/Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)against the assessment order Ext.P1. 2.Having heard the learned counsel on bothsides, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction tothe second respondent to take a decision on Ext.P2appeal in accordance with law, after affording anopportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period ofthree months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment without insisting on payment of 20% of the taxdemanded, as per circular of 2017. Till such time adecision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept inabeyance. SB/05/06/2020 Sd/-AMIT RAWALJUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT-2017-18 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF DELAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan