By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
High Court
29 May 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
29 May 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF MAY 2020 / 8TH JYAISHTA, 1942
WP(C).No.10611 OF 2020(B)
PETITIONER/S:
JIMMY ZACHARIA10A NORTH BLOCK, HEERA WATERS CHILAVANNOOR, KADAVANTHRA, KOCHI 682 020
RESPONDENT/S:
BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
THE INCOME TAX OFFICERNON CORP WARD-1(2),3RD FLOOR, C.R.BUILDING, I.S PRESS ROAD, KOCHI 682 018
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON29.05.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the respondent.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, Idispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent to take adecision on Ext.P2 appeal and stay application Ext.P3 in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner,within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of theorder. Till such time, recovery proceedings pursuant to the demandnotice shall be kept in abeyance. It is made clear that the interim stayis till the disposal of the interim application and not beyond.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWALJUDGE
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
APPENDIX
EXHIBIT P1
EXHIBIT P2EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2011-12
COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT 2011-12
COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.