Case LawHigh Court › By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

High Court 15 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
15 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 25TH JYAISHTA, 1942 WP(C).No.11698 OF 2020(J) PETITIONER/S: BALAKRISHNAN NAIR MANAPPATTU MAHESHKUMARMANAPPATTU HOUSE, KOOROPADA, PANGADA, KOTTAYAM-686502. BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3, INCOME TAX OFFICE, PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING, SHASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686001. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),INCOME TAX OFFICE, SHASTRI ROAD, KOTTAYAM-686001. OTHER PRESENT: SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON15.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction todispose of Ext.P2 appeal preferred before the respondent. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter,I dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent totake a decision on Ext.P2 appeal and stay application Ext.P3 inaccordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing tothe petitioner, within a period of 30 days from the date of receiptof a copy of the order. Till such time, recovery proceedingspursuant to the demand notice shall be kept in abeyance. It ismade clear that the interim stay is till the disposal of the interimapplication and not beyond. nak Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DATED 26.12.2019. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 6.2.2020. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 6.4.2020. EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF CHALLAN NO.01229 FOR RS.50,000/-OF STATE BANK OF INDIA, BANGALORE - PAYMENT MADE BY THE PETITIONER DATED 10.3.2020.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan