By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
High Court
29 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
29 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 8TH POUSHA, 1942
WP(C).No.29150 OF 2020(P)
PETITIONER/S:
K.J.AMUSEMENTSCHATHANKANDATH HOUSE, MANKARA POST, PALAKKAD-678614, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, C.K.DINESHKUMAR.
BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)AAYAKAR BHAVAN, ENGLISH CHURCH ROAD, PALAKKAD-678 014.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),THRISSUR-680 001.
SC,IT- SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 29.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING:
SHAJI P.CHALY, J. ===============================W.P.(C) Nos.29147, 29149 and 29150 of 2020===============================
Dated this the 29[th] day of December, 2020
JUDGMENT
The captioned writ petitions are filed by one andthe same partner ship firm challenging Ext. P1 orderof the first respondent. Being aggrieved, petitionerhas filed Ext.P2 appeal and P3 stay application inall the writ petitions before the second respondent,which are pending consideration.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submittedthat situation would suffice, if a direction isissued to the second respondent to take a decision onExt.P3 stay application submitted by the petitioners.Therefore, after having heard learned counsel for thepetitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for theDepartment this writ petitions are disposed ofdirecting the second respondent to consider Ext.P3
WP(C).Nos.29147, 29149 and 29150 OF 2020(P)
stay applications submitted by the petitioner inExt.P2 appeals and take a decision within two monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.Till such time coercive action if any shall be kept
in abeyance.
Sd/-
rpk
SHAJI P.CHALY
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.