Case LawHigh Court › By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

High Court 29 Dec 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
29 Dec 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY TUESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 8TH POUSHA, 1942 WP(C).No.29150 OF 2020(P) PETITIONER/S: K.J.AMUSEMENTSCHATHANKANDATH HOUSE, MANKARA POST, PALAKKAD-678614, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, C.K.DINESHKUMAR. BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)AAYAKAR BHAVAN, ENGLISH CHURCH ROAD, PALAKKAD-678 014. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),THRISSUR-680 001. SC,IT- SRI CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSIONON 29.12.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THEFOLLOWING: SHAJI P.CHALY, J. ===============================W.P.(C) Nos.29147, 29149 and 29150 of 2020=============================== Dated this the 29[th] day of December, 2020 JUDGMENT The captioned writ petitions are filed by one andthe same partner ship firm challenging Ext. P1 orderof the first respondent. Being aggrieved, petitionerhas filed Ext.P2 appeal and P3 stay application inall the writ petitions before the second respondent,which are pending consideration. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submittedthat situation would suffice, if a direction isissued to the second respondent to take a decision onExt.P3 stay application submitted by the petitioners.Therefore, after having heard learned counsel for thepetitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for theDepartment this writ petitions are disposed ofdirecting the second respondent to consider Ext.P3 WP(C).Nos.29147, 29149 and 29150 OF 2020(P) stay applications submitted by the petitioner inExt.P2 appeals and take a decision within two monthsfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.Till such time coercive action if any shall be kept in abeyance. Sd/- rpk SHAJI P.CHALY JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan