By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
High Court
09 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
09 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Adv. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF JUNE 2020 / 19TH JYAISHTA, 1942
WP(C).No.11228 OF 2020(C)
PETITIONER/S:
KECHERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO. R-286KECHERY P.O., THRISSUR-680 501, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, P.A.DAVIS, AGED 44, S/O.P.D.ANTHONY.
BY ADV. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 1 AND TPS, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR-680 101.WARD 1 AND TPS, GURUVAYUR, THRISSUR-680 101.
2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),AYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR-680 001.AYAKAR BHAVAN, THRISSUR-680 001.
3THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,BY ITS REGISTRAR.BY ITS REGISTRAR.
AYAKAR BHAVAN, KAKKANADU, KOCHI-682 030, REPRESENTED
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI JOSE JOSEPH SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON09.06.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 9[th] day of June 2020
Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction
to dispose of Ext.P3 appeal preferred before the thirdrespondent against the assessment order Ext.P1.
2.Having heard the learned counsel on both sides, thewrit petition is disposed of with a direction to the thirdrespondent to take a decision on Ext.P3 appeal in accordancewith law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to thepetitioner, within a period of three months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment without insisting on paymentof 20% of the tax demanded, as per circular of 2017. Till suchtime a decision is taken on the appeal, recovery proceedingspursuant to the assessment order shall be kept in abeyance.
sab
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-2013.
EXHIBIT P2EXHIBIT P3
COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-2013.
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT 2012-2013.
EXHIBIT P4
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.