By Advs. Sri. Harisankar v. Menon Smt. Meera V.menon Smt.krishna K
High Court
15 May 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs. Sri. Harisankar v. Menon Smt. Meera V.menon Smt.krishna K
Date of order
15 May 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs. Sri. Harisankar v. Menon Smt. Meera V.menon Smt.krishna K, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE GOPINATH.P.
FRIDAY, THE 15 DAY OF MAY, 2020/25 VAISAKHA, 1942
W.P(C) NO.9960 OF 2020
PETITIONER ::
THE NAGALASSERY SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KOOTTANAD POST, KOOTTANAD,PATTAMBI,PALAKKAD – 679 533, REPRESENTED BY ITSSECRETARY, KRISHNAKUMAR N.,AGED 38, S/O. NARAYANAN NAIR.
BY ADVS. SRI. HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT. MEERA V.MENON SMT.KRISHNA K
RESPONDENTS::
1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3, AYAKAR BHAVAN,PALAKKAD – 678 014.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),THRISSUR – 680 021.THRISSUR – 680 021.
3. THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
AYAKAR BHAVAN,KAKKANADU, KOCHI – 682 030, REPRESENTED BY ITSREGISTRAR.
R1-3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. VINITHA.B
THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.05.2020,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Dated this the 15th day of May, 2020
JUDGMENT
This writ petition has been filed praying inter-alia for a direction to the 3rd respondent Tribunalto consider and pass orders on an application forstay.
2.The petitioner claimed the benefit of Section80P of the Income Tax Act. This claim was rejected bythe Assessing Officer as well as by the Commissioner(Appeals).
judgment of a Division Bench of this Court, which isproduced as Ext.P5 along with W.P.(C). No.9768/2020.The Division Bench has in similar circumstances,directed the Appellate Tribunal to consider and passorders on the stay petition within a period of fourmonths from the date of r2014eceipt of a copy of thejudgment and further directed that any proceedings
W.P(C) NO.9960 OF 2020 3
initiated for recovery of amounts due from thepetitioner shall be kept in abeyance till orders arepassed on the stay petition and communicated to the
petitioner.
4.In the light of the above, this writ petitionis disposed of directing the 3rd respondent, theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kochi Bench, toconsider and pass orders on the stay petition markedas Ext.P4 in this writ petition, within a period offour months from the date of receipt of a copy of
this judgment. Till orders are so passed andcommunicated to the petitioner, steps (if any)initiated by the Income Tax Department for recoveryof amounts due under the a2014ssessment order, shallbe kept in abeyance.
With these directions, this writ petition isdisposed of.
(Sd/-)
GOPINATH.P, JUDGE
pm
W.P(C) NO.9960 OF 2020 4
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS EXTS.
EXT. P1. COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1 RESPONDENTFOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DATED 20-11-2017.
EXT. P2. COPY OF APPELLATE ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2 RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DATED 03-03-2020.
EXT. P3.COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE 3 RESPONDENT DATED 05-05-2020.
EXT. P4.COPY OF PETITION FOR STAY FILED BEFORE THE 3 RESPONDENT DATED 05-05-2020.
EXT. P5.COPY OF JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C)-TMP – 36/2020 OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 11-04-2020.
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS: NIL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.