Case LawHigh Court › By Advs. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

By Advs. Sri.harisankar v. Menon

High Court 15 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs. Sri.harisankar v. Menon
Date of order
15 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs. Sri.harisankar v. Menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant tothe impuged order in the appeal shall be kept in abeyance.The writ petition is disposed of as above. akv Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE FRIDAY ,THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1940WP(C).No. 7848 of 2019 PETITIONER: THE KANJIKODE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F 1199, KANJIKODE.P.O,KANJIKODE, PALAKKAD-678 621, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,GURU RAJALINGAM,AGED 57, S/O.MUITHUKARUPPANNA PILLAI. BY ADVS. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.K.KRISHNA SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD 1 AND TPS, AYAKAR BHAVAN, PALAKKAD-678 014.2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 021. SMT. THUSHARA JAMES, GOVERNMENT PLEADERSRI. JOSE JOSEPH, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, impugning Ext. P1 assessment order underthe Income Tax Act, filed Ext. P2 appeal before the secondrespondent. The petitioner also filed Ext. P3 stay application. 2. In view of the above, there shal be a direction to thesecond respondent to take a decision on Ext. P3 stay applicationwithin two months. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant tothe impuged order in the appeal shall be kept in abeyance.The writ petition is disposed of as above. akv Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:NIL. //TRUE COPY// CA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan