Case LawHigh Court › By Advs. Sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.k.k...

By Advs. Sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.k.krishna Smt.meera V.menon

High Court 20 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs. Sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.k.krishna Smt.meera V.menon
Date of order
20 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs. Sri.harisankar v. Menon Smt.k.krishna Smt.meera V.menon, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant tothe impugned order in the appeal shall be kept in abeyance.The writ petition is disposed of as above. akv Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY,THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1940WP(C).No. 8351 of 2019 PETITIONER: THE MANNARKKAD RURAL SERVICE CO-OPEATIVE BANK LTD.NO.P.922,8/767,MANNARKKAD,PALAKKAD-678 582, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.PURUSHOTHAMAN,AGED 52,S/O.MADHAVAN NAIR. BY ADVS. SRI.HARISANKAR V. MENON SMT.K.KRISHNA SMT.MEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: 1THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD 4,AYAKAR BHAVAN,PALAKKAD-678 014. 2THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),SAKTHAN NAGAR, THRISSUR-680 021. SMT. THUSHARA JAMES GPSRI. JOSE JOSEPH SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.03.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT The petitioner, impugning Ext. P1 assessment order underthe Income Tax Act, filed Ext. P2 appeal before the secondrespondent. The petitioner also filed Ext. P3 stay application. 2. In view of the above, there shall be a direction to thesecond respondent to take a decision on Ext. P3 stay applicationwithin two months. Till then, recovery proceedings pursuant tothe impugned order in the appeal shall be kept in abeyance.The writ petition is disposed of as above. akv Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE APPENDIX PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17. RESPONDENT'S/S EXHIBITS:NIL. //TRUE COPY// CA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan