By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon
High Court
17 Jun 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon
Date of order
17 Jun 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Considering the limited relief sought, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the secondrespondent Appellate Authority to consider Ext.P3(a)stay petition and pass orders thereon asexpeditiously as possible and at any rate within aperiod of four months from the date of receipt of acopy of this j...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 17 DAY OF JUNE 2021 / 27TH JYAISHTA, 1943WP(C) NO. 12320 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
1M/S. BIOWIN AGRO RESEARCH, M P 5/587D, VEMOM POST, MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD – 670 645, REPRESENTED ITS DIRECTOR, FR.JOHN JOSEPH
BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI-110001
2NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHI-110001, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER
OTHER PRESENT:
SC CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON17.06.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 17[th] day of June 2021
The petitioner is an assessee under the Income
Tax Act, 1961 and has been issued with Ext.P1assessment order for the year 2018-19. Aggrieved,the petitioner has filed Exts.P3 appeal along with P3(a) stay petition. The limited relief sought is to directthe Appellate Authority to consider the appeal andthe stay petition on an early date and to keep therecovery proceedings based on the assessment orderin abeyance.
2. I have heard learned Standing Counsel forthe Income Tax Department also.
3. Considering the limited relief sought, the writ
petition is disposed of, directing the secondrespondent Appellate Authority to consider Ext.P3(a)stay petition and pass orders thereon asexpeditiously as possible and at any rate within aperiod of four months from the date of receipt of acopy of this judgment. Till such time as an order is
passed on Ext.P3(a), the recovery proceedings based
on Ext.P1 assessment order shall be kept inabeyance.
NB/17.06.21
Sd/-
V.G.ARUNJUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C)12320/21
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2018-19.
EXHIBIT P2COPY OF THE S.O.NO.3296(E) ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI.
EXHIBIT P2 (a)COPY OF THE S.O.NO.3297(E) ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI.
EXHIBIT P3COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 (a)COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE
ADDITIONAL/JOINT/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE,DELHI.
EXHIBIT P4COPY OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN WP(C)NO.5849/2021
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL
TRUE COPYP.A. TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.