By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon
High Court
11 Jun 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon
Date of order
11 Jun 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
FRIDAY, THE 11 DAY OF JUNE 2021 / 21ST JYAISHTA, 1943WP(C) NO. 12094 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
THE KANJIKULAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTDCO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.F1086,KANJIKULAM P.O,PALAKKAD-678 596,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,AJITHKUMAR K.
BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1ADDITIONAL/JOINT/ DEPUTY/ ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER,NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE,DELHI-110011.2.NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE,DELHI-110001, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER
SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
11.06.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
WP(C) NO. 12094 OF 2021
JUDGMENT
Against an assessment order dated 27.04.2021,the petitioner has preferred an appeal togetherwith a stay petition before the 2[nd] respondent.This writ petition is filed for the limited reliefof a direction to the 2[nd] respondent to considerand pass orders on Ext.P3(a) stay petition withina time frame. Learned counsel also prays thatpending consideration of the stay application, thedemand payable in terms of Ext.P1 assessment ordermay be stayed.
2.Considering the limited relief sought forin the writ petition, the writ petition isdisposed of directing the 2[nd]respondent toconsider and pass orders on Ext.P3(a) staypetition within a period of four months from thedate of receipt of a certified copy of thisjudgment. Till such time as orders are passed on
3
WP(C) NO. 12094 OF 2021
Ext.P3(a) any demand pursuant to Ext.P1 order ofassessment shall not be enforced.
hmh
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.JUDGE
4
WP(C) NO. 12094 OF 2021
APPENDIX OF WP(C)12094/2021
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURE
EXHIBIT P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2018-191ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2018-19
EXHIBIT P2COPY OF THE S.O NO.3296(E) ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHITHE MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI
EXHIBIT P2(A)COPY OF THE S.O NO.3297(E) ISSUED BY THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHITHE MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI
EXHIBIT P3COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENTPETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
EXHIBIT P3(A)COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), NATIONAL OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHIPETITIONER BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), NATIONAL OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHI
EXHIBIT P4COPY OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURTIN WPC NO.5849/2021IN WPC NO.5849/2021
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXUREANNEXURE
NIL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.