By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. TUESDAY, THE 17 DAY OF MAY 2022 / 27TH VAISAKHA, 1944WP(C) NO. 16045 OF 2022 PETITIONER: THE ARIYUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO. F1566, 7/505, KOTTOPADAM, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD, 678 583, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, N.P. KARTHIAYANI. BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENON RESPONDENT/S: 1THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICER,NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI 110 001. 2NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHI 110 001. REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEFCOMMISSIONER. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 17.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating toassessment year 2014-2015, petitioner has preferred appealbefore the 2[nd] respondent, copy of which is produced as Ext.P2.Petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to the assessmentorder has also been filed as Ext.P3. Petitioner apprehendscoercive proceedings to be effected even before the petition forstay is considered. Hence this writ petition. 2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinionthat this writ petition itself can be disposed of with a direction. 3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 2[nd]respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition,within a period of two months from the date of receipt of acopy of this judgment. Till such a decision is taken, allcoercive proceedings against the petitioner shall be kept inabeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2014-15. Exhibit P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Exhibit P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.