Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon

By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon

High Court 20 Jun 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon
Date of order
20 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. MONDAY, THE 20 DAY OF JUNE 2022 / 30TH JYAISHTA, 1944WP(C) NO. 19809 OF 2022 PETITIONER: THAYYIL BALAKRISHNAN PRADEEPAGED 55 YEARSTHAYYIL HOUSE, KANIMANGALAM, PALISSERI, THRISSUR - 680 027. BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENON RESPONDENTS: 1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCLE, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT,AAYKAR BHAVAN, SAKTHAN THAMPURAN NAGAR, THRISSUR - 680 001. 2COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, C.R.BUILDING, I.S.PRESS ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018. OTHER PRESENT: GP : ADV.JASMIN M M ; SC-ADV.JOSE JOSEPHSC : ADV.DR.THUSHARA JAMES. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FORADMISSION ON 20.06.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAYDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment relating toassessment year 2014-2015, petitioner has preferred an appealbefore the 1[st] respondent, a copy of which is produced asExt.P2. A petition for stay of proceedings pursuant to theassessment order has also been filed as Ext.P3. Petitionerapprehends coercive proceedings to be effected even before thepetition for stay is considered. Hence, this writ petition. 2. Having considered the submissions of the counsel forthe petitioner as well as the respondents, I am of the opinionthat this writ petition itself can be disposed with a direction. 3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1[st]respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 stay petition,within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copyof this judgment. Till such a decision is taken, all coerciveproceedings against the petitioner shall be kept in abeyance. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/-GOPINATH P. JUDGE W.P.(C) No.19809/2022 -:3:- APPENDIX OF WP(C) 19809/2022 PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1 COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER FOR THE YEAR 2014-15 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. Exhibit P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. Exhibit P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan