By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonharisankar V. Menonmeera V.menon
High Court
25 Apr 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonharisankar V. Menonmeera V.menon
Date of order
25 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonharisankar V. Menonmeera V.menon, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
TUESDAY, THE 25 DAY OF APRIL 2023 / 5TH VAISAKHA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 14366 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
DEEPAK PADIKKAPPARAMBILAGED 29 YEARSEDAPPAL, MALAPPURAM, PIN - 679576
S/O. CHANDRAN, PADIKKAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, AYILAKKAD,
BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONHARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENON
R.SREEJITH
K.KRISHNAPARVATHY MENONPARVATHY MENON
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICERNATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, PIN - 110001INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICERNATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI, PIN - 110001
2NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTREDELHI, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)., PIN - 110001DELHI, REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS)., PIN - 1100013THE INCOME TAX OFFICERINCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, WARD 1 & TPS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN,ENGLISH CHURCH ROAD, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678014INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, WARD 1 & TPS, AAYAKAR BHAVAN,ENGLISH CHURCH ROAD, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678014
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25.04.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
MOHAMMED NIAS. C.P.,J
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
WP(C).No.14366 of 2023
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Dated this the 25[th] day of April, 2023
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment hasfiled Exts.P2 appeal along with Exts.P3 stay application before the2[nd] respondent. The petitioner submits that the 1st respondent isproposing to initiate coercive proceedings notwithstanding thependency of Exts.P2 challenging Ext.P1 assessment order. Thepetitioner submits he has a strong case to put forward to challengeExt.P1 order. He prays for a direction to consider Exts.P2 appeal andExt.P3 stay applications and to stay all coercive proceedings till itsdisposal.
2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the caseand after hearing the learned counsel on either side, I direct the 2[nd]respondent to consider stay petition within three months from today.Till orders are passed as directed above, all coercive steps will bekept in abeyance.
Writ petition is disposed as above.
Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS. C.P., JUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 14366/2023
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2021-22 DTD.15-12-2022
Exhibit P2
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIOENR BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 13-04-2023
Exhibit P3
COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 13-04-2023
Exhibit P4
COPY OF JUDGMENT IN WPC NO. 11417/2023 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT DTD. 11-04-2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.