By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonk.krishna
High Court
18 Jun 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonk.krishna
Date of order
18 Jun 2021
Assessment year(s)
2017-2018
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonk.krishna, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
FRIDAY, THE 18 DAY OF JUNE 2021 / 28TH JYAISHTA, 1943WP(C) NO. 12313 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
ATMA BODHODAYA SANGHAM SREE SUBHANANDA TRUST1,CHERUKOL,MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SWAMI GEETHANANDAN
BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONK.KRISHNA
RESPONDENT/S:
1THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER,NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI-110 0012THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,EXEMPTION WARD-ALAPPUZHA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, ALAPPUZHA-688 011
OTHER PRESENT:
SC FOR CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.06.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.G.ARUN, J.
-----------------------------------------------W.P(C).No.12313 of 2021
-----------------------------------------------
Dated this the 18[th] day of June, 2021JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a charitable trust registered under theprovisions of Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, hadpurchased certain landed properties during the assessment year2017-2018. While processing the returns for the financial year2018-2019, the 1[st] respondent directed the petitioner to producetranslated copies of the sale deeds and the translated copies wereproduced. Due to a mistake in the translation, the properties wereshown to have been purchased by Shree Brahmasree DevanandaGurudeva Thiruvadikal in his individual name and not for thepetitioner trust. Relying on the Malayalam recital in thedocuments, the petitioner contends that the translation isobviously a mistake. The petitioner has filed Exhibit P7 rectificationapplication before the 2[nd] respondent seeking to correct themistakes. The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the 2[nd]respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P7expeditiously.
WP(C).12313/21
2. I have heard the learned Standing Counsel for the IncomeTax Department also.
Considering the limited relief sought, the writ petition isdisposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent to consider Exhibit P7 andpass orders thereon as expeditiously as possible and at any rate,within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of thisjudgment. Till orders are passed on Exhibit P7, recoveryproceedings pursuant to Exhibit P6 shall be kept in abeyance.
The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition alongwith the copy of the judgment before the 2[nd] respondent.
Sd/-
V.G.ARUN, JUDGE
vgs
WP(C).12313/21
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 12313/2021
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1
COPY OF THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE U/S 12AA OF THE INCOME TAX
Exhibit P2Exhibit P4(A)
COPY OF THE TRUST DEED OF THE PETITIONERCOPY OF TRANSLATION OF EXT.P3(A) DOCUMENTNO.1268/17 EXECUTED BY RESHMI HARIKUMAR
Exhibit P4(B)
COPY OF TRANSLATION OF EXT.P3(B) DOCUMENTNO.1439/17 EXECUTED BY RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR& UDAYAKUMARI
Exhibit P4 (C)
COPY OF TRANSLATION OF EXT.P3(C) DOCUMENTNO.1457/17 EXECUTED BY MURALIDHARAN NAIR
Exhibit P4(D)
COPY OF TRANSLATION OF EXT.P3(D) DOCUMENTNO.6616/17 EXECUTED BY SARASWATHY
Exhibit P4(E)
COPY OF TRANSLATION OF EXT.P3(E) DOCUMENTNO.269/18 EXECUTED BY BHAYI
Exhibit P4(F)
COPY OF TRANSLATION OF EXT.P3(F) DOCUMENTNO.856/17 EXECUTED BY SHANTHA
Exhibit P5Exhibit P6Exhibit P7
COPY OF DRAFT ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2018-19
COPY OF THE RECTIFICATION APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS
Exhibit P3
COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1329/17 ISSUED BY S/SHREE BINU WILLIAM AND V JOHNSON
Exhibit P3(A)
DOCUMENT NO.1268/17 EXECUTED BY RESHMI HARIKUMAR
Exhibit P3 (B)
Exhibit P 3 (C)
Exhibit P3 (D)
Exhibit P3 (E)
Exhibit P3(F)
Exhibit P4
COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1439/17 EXECUTED BY RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR & UDAYAKUMARI
COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1457/17 EXECUTED BY MURALIDHARAN NAIR
Exhibit P4(E)
COPY OF TRANSLATION OF EXT.P3(E) DOCUMENTNO.269/18 EXECUTED BY BHAYI
Exhibit P4(F)
COPY OF TRANSLATION OF EXT.P3(F) DOCUMENTNO.856/17 EXECUTED BY SHANTHA
Exhibit P5Exhibit P6Exhibit P7
COPY OF DRAFT ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2018-19
COPY OF THE RECTIFICATION APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS
Exhibit P3
COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1329/17 ISSUED BY S/SHREE BINU WILLIAM AND V JOHNSON
Exhibit P3(A)
DOCUMENT NO.1268/17 EXECUTED BY RESHMI HARIKUMAR
Exhibit P3 (B)
Exhibit P 3 (C)
Exhibit P3 (D)
Exhibit P3 (E)
Exhibit P3(F)
Exhibit P4
COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1439/17 EXECUTED BY RADHAKRISHNAN NAIR & UDAYAKUMARI
COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.1457/17 EXECUTED BY MURALIDHARAN NAIR
COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.6616/17 EXECUTED BY SARASWATHY
COPY OF DOCUMENT NO.269/18 EXECUTED BY BHAYICOPY OF DOCUMENT NO.856/17 EXECUTED BY SANTHA
COPY OF TRANSLATION OF EXT. P3 DOCUMENT NO.1329/17 ISSUED BY S/SHREE BINU WILLIAMAND V JOHNSON
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.