By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonk.krishnar.sreejith
High Court
28 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonk.krishnar.sreejith
Date of order
28 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonk.krishnar.sreejith, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The appeal fails and is dismissed, however leaving open allcontentions to be raised before the appropriate authority. jjj Sd/- S.V.BHATTIJUDGESd/- BASANT BALAJIJUDGE
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BASANT BALAJI
THURSDAY, THE 28 DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 6TH KARTHIKA, 1943WA NO. 1391 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 21585/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/S:
M/S.MARYMATHA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTDMARYMATHA SQUARE, ARAKKUZHA ROAD, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM 686 661, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SABU CHERIAN
BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONK.KRISHNAR.SREEJITH
RESPONDENT/S:
THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICERNATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI 100 001
OTHER PRESENT:
SC SRI JOSE JOSEPH
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.10.2021, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.A. No. 1391/2021
S.V.Bhatti, J.
J U D G M E N T
The writ petitioner is the appellant. The petitioner laidchallenge on Ext.P22 assessment order dated 23.09.2021. As per thescheme of the Income Tax Act, the petitioner has effective remedyof appeal under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act. The learnedJudge for available reasons and grounds declined to exercise thediscretionary jurisdiction. We are in agreement with the view of thelearned Single Judge.
The appeal fails and is dismissed, however leaving open allcontentions to be raised before the appropriate authority.
jjj
Sd/- S.V.BHATTIJUDGESd/-
BASANT BALAJIJUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.