Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon...

By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna

High Court 13 May 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
Date of order
13 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI FRIDAY, THE 13 DAY OF MAY 2022 / 23RD VAISAKHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 15835 OF 2022 PETITIONER: THE KUMARAMPUTHUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.P-373, MANNARKKAD COLLEGE P.O., KUMARAMPUTHUR, PALAKKAD-678 583, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE, VIJAYAKUMAR K.K. BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNA RESPONDENTS: 1THE ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/INCOME TAX OFFICERNATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI-110 001 2NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE,DELHI-110 001, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONERSRI.JOSE JOSEPH (SC) SRI.SAYYED MURTHALA THANGAL, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON13.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R. RAVI, J. ---------------------------------------- W.P.(C). No. 15835 of 2022 -------------------------------------------Dated this the 13[th] day of May, 2022 JUDGMENT Admit. Standing Counsel takes notice for respondents.The limited prayer in the writ petition is for a disposal ofExt.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition. In view of the limitedprayer made in the writ petition, the writ petition is disposed ofdirecting the respondents to hear and dispose of Ext.P2 appeal atthe earliest. There will be a further direction to the respondents totake up Ext.P3 stay petition and hear and dispose of the samewithin three months. Coercive steps for recovery shall remainstayed till the disposal of the stay petition. Sd/- T.R.RAVIJUDGE Pn APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15835/2022 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 DATED29.03.2022 Exhibit P2 COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27.04.2022 Exhibit P3 COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 27.04.2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan