Case LawHigh Court › By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menon...

By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna

High Court 07 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
Date of order
07 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI TUESDAY, THE 7 DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 16TH PHALGUNA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 7546 OF 2023 PETITIONER: AMMUJAKSHI RADHAMANIAGED 52 YEARSRADEYAM PUTHIYAVILA KANDALOOR ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 691 001 BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNA RESPONDENTS: 1THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE CENTRAL, AAYAKAR BHAVAN RLY.STATION ROAD KOLLAM, PIN – 691 001 2NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE DELHI, - PIN – 110 001 REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: T.R.RAVI, J. ---------------------------------------- WP (C) No.7546 of 2023 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 07[th] day of March, 2023 JUDGMENT Admit. Standing Counsel takes notice for therespondents. 2. The limited prayer in this writ petition is for a directionto the 2[nd] respondent to dispose of Ext.P2 appeal filed againstExt.P1 assessment order and Ext.P3 stay petition. 3. In view of the limited prayer made in the writ petition,this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondent totake up Ext.P2 appeal and Ext.P3 stay petition and hear anddispose of the stay petition within two months from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this judgment. The coercive steps forrecovery shall be kept in abeyance till then. Sd/- T.R.RAVI sn JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 7546/2023 PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS Exhibit P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2016-17 DTD. 27-09-2021 Exhibit P2COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 26-10-2021 Exhibit P3COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERBEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 09-02-2023 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan