By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
High Court
18 Mar 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
Date of order
18 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In By Advs.harisankar v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Hence this writ petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH
MONDAY, THE 18 DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 38927 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
MUHAMMED HARIS PUNNILATH,AGED 88 YEARS, PUNNILATH HOUSE, PAPPINIVATTOM VILLAGE, MATHILAKAM POST, THRISSUR , REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, MUHAMMED, AGED 88, S/O. MUHAMMED HAJI, PUNNILATH HOUSE, MATHILAKAM P.O., THRISSUR, PIN – 680 685.
BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNA
RESPONDENTS:
1COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (WARD INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGS, I.S. PRESS ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI, PIN – 682 018.
2DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL-2,INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, A WING, KENDRIYA SADAN, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU , REPRESENTED BY ITS ASST. SECRETARY, PIN – 560 034.
3THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU, PIN – 560 001.
BY ADVS.
G.KEERTHIVAS, STANDING COUNSEL
P.G.JAYASHANKAR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON18.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
DINESH KUMAR SINGH, J.
--------------------------
WP(C) No.38927 of 2022
-------------------------
Dated this the 18[th] day of March, 2024
JUDGMENT
After some arguments, the Learned Counsel for the petitioner
seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Hence
this writ petition is hereby dismissed as withdrawn.
Svn
Sd/-
DINESH KUMAR SINGHJUDGE
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 38927/2022
PETITIONER’S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1STRESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DTD.27-12-2017.RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DTD.27-12-2017.
Exhibit P2COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENTDTD. 30-03-2021.DTD. 30-03-2021.
Exhibit P3COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTDTD. 30-03-2022.DTD. 30-03-2022.
Exhibit P4COPY OF COVERING LETTER FROM THEPETITIONER'S CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT ALONGWITH OBJECTION IN FORM 35A DTD. 26-04-2022.PETITIONER'S CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT ALONGWITH OBJECTION IN FORM 35A DTD. 26-04-2022.
Exhibit P5COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTFOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DTD. 27-05-2022.FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DTD. 27-05-2022.
Exhibit P6COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD.30-05-2022.PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DTD.30-05-2022.
Exhibit P7COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENTDTD. 14-10-2022.DTD. 14-10-2022.
Exhibit P8COPY OF APPLICATION FILED BY THEPETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPODNENT DTD.15-06-2022.PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPODNENT DTD.15-06-2022.
Exhibit P9COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENTDTD. 04-11-2022.DTD. 04-11-2022.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.